Evaluations

“The Good Days are Amazing”  An Evaluation of the Writers in Prison Network 

This qualitative evaluation by Sheffield Hallam University was designed to:

  • map the activities of the Writers in Prison Network (WIPN)
  • identify the barriers and facilitators to effective delivery of the programme
  • identify effective practice
  • assess the impact of the programme on prisoners, writers and prison staff
  • assess the effectiveness of ... read on →

    Authors Katherine Albertson, Caroline O'Keefe (Hallam Centre for Community Justice, Sheffield Hallam University)

    Published October 2012

    Artforms Creative Writing, Multi-Arts

    Organisation Writers in Prison Network

    • The art of inclusion

    An Arts Council England (ACE) evaluation, exploring practice and outcomes within three different identified models of social inclusion work, involving 28 artsorganisations participating in the research and builds on a literature review, The Arts and Social Exclusion: a review prepared for the Arts Council of England (Jermyn, 2001). The overall ... read on →

    Author Helen Jermyn (Arts Council England)

    Published July 2004

    Artform Multi-Arts

    Go to homepage

    Arts Alliance Evidence Library

    Filters: Multi‑Arts [x], Best practice review [x]

    Filter by:

    [x] close filter
    CJS Context [ + ]
    Prison (1)
    Prison and Community (1)
    Participant type [ + ]
    Project venue [ + ]
    Region [ + ]
    England (2)
    Art form [ + ]
    Multi‑Arts [x]
    Creative Writing (1)
    Project Outputs [ + ]
    Accredited Course (1)
    Arts‑based workshops (2)
    Performances (1)
    Model of Change [ + ]
    Evaluation focus [ + ]
    Distinctive contribution of Arts (1)
    Impact of arts‑based approaches (2)
    Impact of programme (1)
    Improved model of delivery (1)
    Key indicator [ + ]
    Best practice review [x]
    Impact on Institution (1)
    Programme design (2)
    Quality of participatory arts (1)
    Relationships with staff (1)
    Sustainability (1)
    Methodology [ + ]
    Case Studies (1)
    Diaries (1)
    Evaluation reviews (1)
    Focus Groups (1)
    Interviews (2)
    Literature search (2)
    Observation (1)
    Outcomes analysis (1)
    Questionnaires (1)
    Data type [ + ]
    Qualitative (2)
    Research Limitations [ + ]
    Attribution (1)
    Links to Government targets (1)
    Projection of future benefits (1)
    Publication type [ + ]
    Academic Institution report (1)
    Independent Report (1)
    Participant age [ + ]
    Participant gender [ + ]
    Delivery methodologies [ + ]