Evaluations

Family Man: 2012-13 Evaluation Scope

The purpose of this evaluation is to demonstrate the long-term impact and cost-effectiveness of Family Man to policy makers, funders, prisons and practitioners; and to complement Gwyneth Boswell’s qualitative study of the revised Family Man and other previous evaluations. read on →

Published 2013

Artform Drama

Organisation Safe Ground   Project venues Belmarsh, Birmingham, Bristol, Dovegate, Highpoint, Leeds, Parc, Wandsworth

Participant type Male and Female Adult Families of offenders, Male and Female Juvenile Families of offenders, Male Adult Offenders, Male and Female Adult Prison Staff

Sample size: 500

Evaluation of Supporters' Participation in Family Man Trials

AN EVALUATION OF SUPPORTERS’ PARTICIPATION IN THE REVISED ‘FAMILY MAN’ PROGRAMME DELIVERED IN BELMARSH, BIRMINGHAM, BRISTOL, HIGHPOINT AND WANDSWORTH PRISONS read on →

Author Avril Price

Published June 2009

Artform Drama

Organisation Boswell Research Fellows   Project venues Belmarsh, Birmingham, Bristol, Highpoint, Wandsworth

Participant type Male and Female Adult Families of offenders

Sample size: 21

Go to homepage

Arts Alliance Evidence Library

Filters: Prison and Community [x], Families of offenders [x]

Filter by:

[x] close filter
CJS Context [ + ]
Prison and Community [x]
Prison (1)
Participant type [ + ]
Families of offenders [x]
Offenders (1)
Prison Staff (1)
Project venue [ + ]
Belmarsh (2)
Birmingham (2)
Bristol (2)
Dovegate (1)
Highpoint (2)
Leeds (1)
Parc (1)
Wandsworth (2)
Region [ + ]
England (3)
Art form [ + ]
Drama (2)
Project Outputs [ + ]
Accreditation (1)
Arts‑based workshops (2)
Performances (1)
Structured workshop programme (1)
Model of Change [ + ]
Desistance (1)
Drama therapy (1)
Social Learning Theories (1)
Evaluation focus [ + ]
Attitudinal change (2)
Behaviour change (2)
Cost benefit (1)
Emotional change (1)
Engagement (1)
ETE Education Training and Employment (1)
Impact of arts‑based approaches (1)
Impact of programme (1)
Improved model of delivery (1)
Learning outcomes (1)
Personal development (1)
Reducing offending (1)
Rehabilitation (1)
Resettlement (1)
Theoretical basis of programme (1)
Well Being (1)
Key indicator [ + ]
Communication skills (1)
Confidence (1)
Empathy (1)
Engagement (1)
Identity different from being offender (1)
Impact on Institution (1)
Listening skills (1)
Motivation to Change (1)
Personal skills (1)
Relationships with families (1)
Relationships with staff (1)
Methodology [ + ]
Academic analysis (1)
Assessments of change (1)
Control Group (1)
Data analysis (1)
Evaluation reviews (1)
Interviews (1)
Survey (1)
Telephone interviews (1)
Data type [ + ]
Qualitative (1)
Qualitative and Quantitative  (2)
Research Limitations [ + ]
Access to participants (1)
Pilot programme (1)
Publication type [ + ]
Academic Institution report (2)
Independent Report (1)
Participant age [ + ]
Juvenile (1)
Adult (2)
Participant gender [ + ]
Male and Female (2)
Male (1)
Delivery methodologies [ + ]