Evaluations

Developments in the HM Prison Service and Safe Ground Family Man programme, and the Safe Ground Network during 2007-8: An independent review

The purpose of this evaulation was to examine the developments Safe Ground had made to one of its prison interventions, Family Man, and to the Safe Ground network during the period 2007-08 following recommendations made in previous reviews. It utilised semi structured qualitative face to face interviews, telephone interviews and questionnaires ... read on →

Authors Gwyneth Boswell, Fiona Poland

Published October 2008

Artform Drama

Organisation Safe Ground   Project venues Belmarsh, Wandsworth

Participant type Male and Female Adult Families of offenders, Male Adult Offenders, Male and Female Adult Staff

Sample size: 258

Engage Cymru 'Summer Arts Colleges Summer 2016'

read on →

Author Angela Rogers (Engage Cymru)

Artform Visual Arts

Organisations Engage Cymru, Unitas   Project venues Bridgend and Hillside Secure Unit, Parc

Participant type Male Juvenile Offenders, Male Juvenile Young People at risk

Go to homepage

Arts Alliance Evidence Library

Filters: Learning outcomes [x], Sample size [x]

Filter by:

[x] close filter
CJS Context [ + ]
Prison (2)
PRU‑Pupil Referral Unit (1)
YOT  (1)
Participant type [ + ]
Families of offenders (1)
Offenders (2)
Staff (1)
Young People at risk (1)
Project venue [ + ]
Belmarsh (1)
Bridgend and Hillside Secure Unit (1)
Parc (1)
Wandsworth (1)
Region [ + ]
England (1)
Wales (1)
Art form [ + ]
Drama (1)
Visual Arts (1)
Project Outputs [ + ]
Accreditation (1)
Arts Award (1)
Arts‑based workshops (1)
Model of Change [ + ]
Adult learning theory (1)
Desistance (1)
Drama therapy (1)
Evaluation focus [ + ]
Learning outcomes [x]
Attitudinal change (2)
Behaviour change (1)
Confidence (1)
Distinctive contribution of Arts (1)
Emotional change (1)
Impact of arts‑based approaches (2)
Impact of programme (1)
Improved model of delivery (1)
Life Skills (1)
Literacy and numeracy (1)
Participation (1)
Personal development (2)
Reducing offending (1)
Rehabilitation (1)
Self‑Esteem (2)
Sense of self (2)
Skills development (1)
Value of Arts methodologies (2)
Well Being (1)
Key indicator [ + ]
Accreditation (1)
Attendance (1)
Attitudes to parenting (1)
Attitudinal change (1)
Behavioural  change (1)
Challenging offending (1)
Commitment (1)
Communication skills (1)
Confidence (1)
Engagement (1)
Estimate of impact (1)
Identity different from being offender (1)
Listening skills (1)
Offending rates (1)
Outcomes data (1)
Personal skills (1)
Reducing offending (1)
Relationships with families (1)
Relationships with staff (1)
Self‑Esteem (1)
Social and Life Skills (1)
Well Being (1)
Methodology [ + ]
Academic analysis (1)
Assessments of change (1)
Data analysis (1)
Discussion (1)
Focus Groups (1)
Interviews (1)
Observation (1)
Questionnaires (2)
Reconviction study (1)
Survey (1)
Telephone interviews (1)
Data type [ + ]
Qualitative and Quantitative  (2)
Research Limitations [ + ]
Sample size [x]
Access to participants (1)
Control Groups (1)
Longer term impact (1)
Measuring crime reduction (1)
Projection of future benefits (1)
Tracking (1)
Publication type [ + ]
Academic Institution report (1)
Evaluation Report (1)
Participant age [ + ]
Juvenile (1)
Adult (1)
Participant gender [ + ]
Male and Female (1)
Male (2)
Delivery methodologies [ + ]