Evaluations

Family Man: 2012-13 Evaluation Scope

The purpose of this evaluation is to demonstrate the long-term impact and cost-effectiveness of Family Man to policy makers, funders, prisons and practitioners; and to complement Gwyneth Boswell’s qualitative study of the revised Family Man and other previous evaluations. read on →

Published 2013

Artform Drama

Organisation Safe Ground   Project venues Belmarsh, Birmingham, Bristol, Dovegate, Highpoint, Leeds, Parc, Wandsworth

Participant type Male and Female Adult Families of offenders, Male and Female Juvenile Families of offenders, Male Adult Offenders, Male and Female Adult Prison Staff

Sample size: 500

The ‘Family Man’ Impact Study

An Evaluation of the Longer-Term Effectiveness of Safe Ground’s Revised Family Relationships Programme on Prisoner Graduates, their Supporters and Families, this independent study assessed the longer-term impact of the Family Man programme delivered in HMPs Belmarsh, Birmingham, Bristol, Highpoint, Leeds, Parc (Wales) and Wandsworth from 2008-10. It concluded that the ... read on →

Authors Gwyneth Boswell, Annie Moseley, Fiona Poland (School of Allied Health Professions, University of East Anglia , University of East Anglia )

Published October 2011

Artform Drama

Organisation Safe Ground   Project venues Belmarsh, Birmingham, Bristol, Highpoint, Leeds, Parc, Wandsworth

Participant type Male Adult Offenders

Sample size: 54

The Academy: a report on outcomes for participants

An evaluation of the two-year experimental phase of Dance United’s Academy project, this report showed that the Academy’s dance-led education programme delivered measurable increases in their capacity to learn and imparted a range of so-called ‘soft’ skills, which can, in turn, be linked to very favourable ‘hard’ outcomes in criminal ... read on →

Authors Andrew Miles, Paul Srauss (Centre for Research on Socio-cultural Change, University of Manchester)

Published 2008

Artform Dance

Organisation Dance United   Project venues Askham Grange, Bradford, Leeds, Wetherby

Participant type Male and Female Juvenile Offenders, Female Juvenile Offenders, Male Adult Offenders, Male and Female Child School pupils

Sample size: 64

Go to homepage

Arts Alliance Evidence Library

Filters: Prison [x], Leeds [x]

Filter by:

[x] close filter
CJS Context [ + ]
Prison [x]
Prison and Community (1)
Schools (1)
YOT  (1)
Participant type [ + ]
Families of offenders (1)
Offenders (3)
Prison Staff (1)
School pupils (1)
Project venue [ + ]
Leeds [x]
Askham Grange (1)
Belmarsh (2)
Birmingham (2)
Bradford (1)
Bristol (2)
Dovegate (1)
Highpoint (2)
Parc (2)
Wandsworth (2)
Wetherby (1)
Region [ + ]
England (3)
Art form [ + ]
Dance (1)
Drama (2)
Project Outputs [ + ]
Arts‑based workshops (1)
Structured workshop programme (2)
Model of Change [ + ]
Desistance (2)
Drama therapy (1)
Evaluation focus [ + ]
Attitudinal change (2)
Behaviour change (2)
Cost benefit (1)
Distinctive contribution of Arts (1)
Emotional change (1)
ETE Education Training and Employment (1)
Impact of arts‑based approaches (1)
Impact of programme (1)
Improved model of delivery (1)
Learning outcomes (1)
Personal development (1)
Reducing offending (1)
Rehabilitation (1)
Well Being (1)
Key indicator [ + ]
Attendance (1)
Attitudes to parenting (1)
Attitudinal change (2)
Behavioural  change (1)
Capacity to learn (1)
Completion rates (1)
Confidence (1)
ETE ‑ Education Training Employment (1)
Relationships with families (1)
Social and Life Skills (1)
Team work (1)
Methodology [ + ]
Academic analysis (1)
Assessments of change (1)
Asset analysis (1)
Attendance registers (1)
Control Group (1)
Data analysis (1)
Evaluation reviews (1)
Feedback forms (1)
Interviews (2)
Observation (1)
Outcomes analysis (1)
Participant observation (1)
Questionnaires (2)
Survey (1)
Data type [ + ]
Qualitative and Quantitative  (3)
Research Limitations [ + ]
Incomplete data (1)
Longer term impact (1)
Sample size (1)
Publication type [ + ]
Academic Institution report (2)
Independent Report (1)
Participant age [ + ]
Juvenile (2)
Adult (2)
Child (1)
Adult (1)
Participant gender [ + ]
Female (1)
Male and Female (2)
Male (3)
Delivery methodologies [ + ]