Evaluations

Family Man: 2012-13 Evaluation Scope

The purpose of this evaluation is to demonstrate the long-term impact and cost-effectiveness of Family Man to policy makers, funders, prisons and practitioners; and to complement Gwyneth Boswell’s qualitative study of the revised Family Man and other previous evaluations. read on →

Published 2013

Artform Drama

Organisation Safe Ground   Project venues Belmarsh, Birmingham, Bristol, Dovegate, Highpoint, Leeds, Parc, Wandsworth

Participant type Male and Female Adult Families of offenders, Male and Female Juvenile Families of offenders, Male Adult Offenders, Male and Female Adult Prison Staff

Sample size: 500

Developments in the HM Prison Service and Safe Ground Family Man programme, and the Safe Ground Network during 2007-8: An independent review

The purpose of this evaulation was to examine the developments Safe Ground had made to one of its prison interventions, Family Man, and to the Safe Ground network during the period 2007-08 following recommendations made in previous reviews. It utilised semi structured qualitative face to face interviews, telephone interviews and questionnaires ... read on →

Authors Gwyneth Boswell, Fiona Poland

Published October 2008

Artform Drama

Organisation Safe Ground   Project venues Belmarsh, Wandsworth

Participant type Male and Female Adult Families of offenders, Male Adult Offenders, Male and Female Adult Staff

Sample size: 258

Go to homepage

Arts Alliance Evidence Library

Filters: Drama therapy [x], Qualitative and Quantitative  [x], Male and Female [x]

Filter by:

[x] close filter
CJS Context [ + ]
Prison (2)
Prison and Community (1)
Participant type [ + ]
Families of offenders (2)
Offenders (2)
Prison Staff (1)
Staff (1)
Project venue [ + ]
Belmarsh (2)
Birmingham (1)
Bristol (1)
Dovegate (1)
Highpoint (1)
Leeds (1)
Parc (1)
Wandsworth (2)
Region [ + ]
England (5)
Art form [ + ]
Drama (2)
Project Outputs [ + ]
Arts‑based workshops (2)
Model of Change [ + ]
Drama therapy [x]
Adult learning theory (1)
Desistance (2)
Evaluation focus [ + ]
Attitudinal change (2)
Behaviour change (2)
Confidence (1)
Cost benefit (1)
Distinctive contribution of Arts (1)
Emotional change (2)
Impact of arts‑based approaches (2)
Impact of programme (2)
Improved model of delivery (1)
Learning outcomes (1)
Personal development (2)
Reducing offending (2)
Rehabilitation (2)
Self‑Esteem (1)
Sense of self (1)
Value of Arts methodologies (1)
Well Being (1)
Key indicator [ + ]
Attendance (1)
Attitudes to parenting (1)
Attitudinal change (1)
Behavioural  change (1)
Challenging offending (1)
Commitment (1)
Communication skills (1)
Confidence (1)
Engagement (1)
Estimate of impact (1)
Identity different from being offender (1)
Listening skills (1)
Offending rates (1)
Outcomes data (1)
Personal skills (1)
Reducing offending (1)
Relationships with families (1)
Relationships with staff (1)
Self‑Esteem (1)
Social and Life Skills (1)
Well Being (1)
Methodology [ + ]
Academic analysis (2)
Assessments of change (2)
Control Group (1)
Data analysis (2)
Evaluation reviews (1)
Focus Groups (1)
Interviews (1)
Questionnaires (1)
Reconviction study (1)
Survey (1)
Telephone interviews (1)
Data type [ + ]
Qualitative and Quantitative  [x]
Research Limitations [ + ]
Control Groups (1)
Longer term impact (1)
Measuring crime reduction (1)
Sample size (1)
Publication type [ + ]
Academic Institution report (5)
Participant age [ + ]
Juvenile (1)
Adult (2)
Participant gender [ + ]
Male and Female [x]
Male (2)
Delivery methodologies [ + ]