Evaluations

Family Man: 2012-13 Evaluation Scope

The purpose of this evaluation is to demonstrate the long-term impact and cost-effectiveness of Family Man to policy makers, funders, prisons and practitioners; and to complement Gwyneth Boswell’s qualitative study of the revised Family Man and other previous evaluations. read on →

Published 2013

Artform Drama

Organisation Safe Ground   Project venues Belmarsh, Birmingham, Bristol, Dovegate, Highpoint, Leeds, Parc, Wandsworth

Participant type Male and Female Adult Families of offenders, Male and Female Juvenile Families of offenders, Male Adult Offenders, Male and Female Adult Prison Staff

Sample size: 500

Engage Cymru 'Summer Arts Colleges Summer 2016'

read on →

Author Angela Rogers (Engage Cymru)

Artform Visual Arts

Organisations Engage Cymru, Unitas   Project venues Bridgend and Hillside Secure Unit, Parc

Participant type Male Juvenile Offenders, Male Juvenile Young People at risk

Go to homepage

Arts Alliance Evidence Library

Filters: Parc [x], Survey [x]

Filter by:

[x] close filter
CJS Context [ + ]
Prison (2)
Prison and Community (1)
PRU‑Pupil Referral Unit (1)
YOT  (1)
Participant type [ + ]
Families of offenders (1)
Offenders (2)
Prison Staff (1)
Young People at risk (1)
Project venue [ + ]
Parc [x]
Belmarsh (1)
Birmingham (1)
Bridgend and Hillside Secure Unit (1)
Bristol (1)
Dovegate (1)
Highpoint (1)
Leeds (1)
Wandsworth (1)
Region [ + ]
England (1)
Wales (1)
Art form [ + ]
Drama (1)
Visual Arts (1)
Project Outputs [ + ]
Accreditation (1)
Arts Award (1)
Arts‑based workshops (1)
Model of Change [ + ]
Desistance (1)
Drama therapy (1)
Evaluation focus [ + ]
Attitudinal change (2)
Behaviour change (1)
Cost benefit (1)
Emotional change (1)
Impact of arts‑based approaches (2)
Impact of programme (1)
Learning outcomes (1)
Life Skills (1)
Literacy and numeracy (1)
Participation (1)
Personal development (2)
Reducing offending (1)
Rehabilitation (1)
Self‑Esteem (1)
Sense of self (1)
Skills development (1)
Value of Arts methodologies (1)
Well Being (2)
Key indicator [ + ]
Accreditation (1)
Methodology [ + ]
Survey [x]
Academic analysis (1)
Assessments of change (1)
Control Group (1)
Data analysis (1)
Discussion (1)
Evaluation reviews (1)
Observation (1)
Questionnaires (1)
Data type [ + ]
Qualitative and Quantitative  (2)
Research Limitations [ + ]
Access to participants (1)
Projection of future benefits (1)
Sample size (1)
Tracking (1)
Publication type [ + ]
Academic Institution report (1)
Evaluation Report (1)
Participant age [ + ]
Juvenile (2)
Adult (1)
Participant gender [ + ]
Male and Female (1)
Male (2)
Delivery methodologies [ + ]