Evaluation Title
An evaluation of the Artist in Residence at HMP Grendon
Type of evaluation
Data type Qualitative
Evaluation Focus Distinctive contribution of Arts, Impact of arts-based approaches, Impact on institution
Project output Arts-based workshops
Methodologies Case Studies, Interviews, Observation, Questionnaires
Summary of evaluation
Through observation and interviews with inmates and staff,this report documents the process of developing an artistic residency in a Therapeutic Community prison and provides an evaluation of the impact on those taking part. Based on observations across four prison wings and interviews with sixteen inmates, this report is able to conclude that the residency has promoted a number of positive outcomes for those taking part:
It is open and inclusive, and this is in part a benefit of having the sessions on each wing.
The notion of ‘responsivity’ is key in successful working withoffenders. The residency fulfils this concept, being highly responsive to the needs of individuals.
For the most part the residency groups have formed as supportive and nurturing environments, yet also environments where constructive criticism is encouraged.This is particularly significant as, outside of their Grendon community, many of these men are unlikely to have ever experienced truly supportive and cooperative group environments.
The men have experienced great progress in their creative and technical abilities.
Many of the men have experienced significant improvements in their confidence and self-esteem.
A majority of men now work on their art outside of sessions, providing them with constructive activity for which they feel great enthusiasm.
Project description
To be an inspirational role, as opposed to a formal teaching role
To engage the outside world through outside exhibitions
To provide a set programme of delivery for offenders at HMP Grendon.
Total sample size
16- Male Adult Offenders
Links
Info
Artform
Visual ArtsCJS Context
PrisonProject venue
Region
Evaluating organisation
Author
Laura Caulfield
Conducted: 2009 – 2011
Published: October 2011
Type: Academic Institution report