Evaluations

“The Good Days are Amazing”  An Evaluation of the Writers in Prison Network 

This qualitative evaluation by Sheffield Hallam University was designed to:

  • map the activities of the Writers in Prison Network (WIPN)
  • identify the barriers and facilitators to effective delivery of the programme
  • identify effective practice
  • assess the impact of the programme on prisoners, writers and prison staff
  • assess the effectiveness of ... read on →

    Authors Katherine Albertson, Caroline O'Keefe (Hallam Centre for Community Justice, Sheffield Hallam University)

    Published October 2012

    Artforms Creative Writing, Multi-Arts

    Organisation Writers in Prison Network

    • Interim evaluation report: May 2007 – May 2008

    An evaluation of the projects delivered by Music In Detention (MiD) in 3 Immigration Removal Centres (IRCs) during 2007-08. It covers the music interventions, quality of life (for detainees) and channels of communicaton (between IRCs and communities/wider public). Within these areas it focused on the elements of self-expression, culturally relevant ... read on →

    Author Karin van Maanen (Anne Peaker Centre)

    Published 2008

    Artform Music

    Organisation Music in Detention   Project venues Dover IRC, Harmondsworth IRC, Haslar IRC

    Go to homepage

    Arts Alliance Evidence Library

    Filters: Best practice review [x], Questionnaires [x]

    Filter by:

    [x] close filter
    CJS Context [ + ]
    Immigration Removal Centre (1)
    Prison (1)
    Participant type [ + ]
    Project venue [ + ]
    Dover IRC (1)
    Harmondsworth IRC (1)
    Haslar IRC (1)
    Region [ + ]
    England (2)
    Art form [ + ]
    Creative Writing (1)
    Multi‑Arts (1)
    Music (1)
    Project Outputs [ + ]
    Accredited Course (1)
    Arts‑based workshops (2)
    Model of Change [ + ]
    Evaluation focus [ + ]
    Distinctive contribution of Arts (1)
    Impact of arts‑based approaches (1)
    Impact of programme (1)
    Improved model of delivery (2)
    Well Being (1)
    Key indicator [ + ]
    Best practice review [x]
    Impact on Institution (1)
    Programme design (1)
    Quality of participatory arts (1)
    Relationships with staff (2)
    Well Being (1)
    Methodology [ + ]
    Questionnaires [x]
    Diaries (1)
    Focus Groups (1)
    Interviews (2)
    Literature search (1)
    Observation (1)
    Outcomes analysis (1)
    SWOT analysis (1)
    Data type [ + ]
    Qualitative (2)
    Research Limitations [ + ]
    Access to participants (1)
    Tracking (1)
    Publication type [ + ]
    Academic Institution report (1)
    Independent Report (1)
    Participant age [ + ]
    Participant gender [ + ]
    Delivery methodologies [ + ]