Evaluations

“The Good Days are Amazing”  An Evaluation of the Writers in Prison Network 

This qualitative evaluation by Sheffield Hallam University was designed to:

  • map the activities of the Writers in Prison Network (WIPN)
  • identify the barriers and facilitators to effective delivery of the programme
  • identify effective practice
  • assess the impact of the programme on prisoners, writers and prison staff
  • assess the effectiveness of ... read on →

    Authors Katherine Albertson, Caroline O'Keefe (Hallam Centre for Community Justice, Sheffield Hallam University)

    Published October 2012

    Artforms Creative Writing, Multi-Arts

    Organisation Writers in Prison Network

    • Clean Break Access to Creative Industries Project: An end of term evaluation

    This evaluation looks at the key elements in the design, delivery and outcomes of this Clean Break project, including recruitment and retention, quality of design and delivery, support for progression routes and working with delivery partners. read on →

    Published

    Artform Multi-Arts

    Organisation Clean Break

    Participant type Female Adult Ex offenders

    Sample size: 106

    Go to homepage

    Arts Alliance Evidence Library

    Filters: Accredited Course [x], Questionnaires [x]

    Filter by:

    [x] close filter
    CJS Context [ + ]
    Community (1)
    Prison (1)
    Participant type [ + ]
    Ex offenders (1)
    Project venue [ + ]
    Region [ + ]
    England (2)
    Art form [ + ]
    Creative Writing (1)
    Multi‑Arts (2)
    Project Outputs [ + ]
    Accredited Course [x]
    Arts‑based workshops (1)
    Model of Change [ + ]
    Evaluation focus [ + ]
    Impact of arts‑based approaches (1)
    Impact of programme (1)
    Improved model of delivery (1)
    Rehabilitation (1)
    Resettlement (1)
    Key indicator [ + ]
    Accreditation (1)
    Best practice review (1)
    Impact on Institution (1)
    Motivation to Change (1)
    Programme completion (1)
    Programme design (1)
    Progression Routes (1)
    Relationships with staff (1)
    Methodology [ + ]
    Questionnaires [x]
    Data analysis (1)
    Diaries (1)
    Focus Groups (1)
    Interviews (2)
    Literature search (1)
    Observation (1)
    Outcomes analysis (1)
    Data type [ + ]
    Qualitative (1)
    Qualitative and Quantitative  (1)
    Research Limitations [ + ]
    Publication type [ + ]
    Academic Institution report (1)
    Independent Report (1)
    Participant age [ + ]
    Adult (1)
    Participant gender [ + ]
    Female (1)
    Delivery methodologies [ + ]