Evaluations

“The Good Days are Amazing”  An Evaluation of the Writers in Prison Network 

This qualitative evaluation by Sheffield Hallam University was designed to:

  • map the activities of the Writers in Prison Network (WIPN)
  • identify the barriers and facilitators to effective delivery of the programme
  • identify effective practice
  • assess the impact of the programme on prisoners, writers and prison staff
  • assess the effectiveness of ... read on →

    Authors Katherine Albertson, Caroline O'Keefe (Hallam Centre for Community Justice, Sheffield Hallam University)

    Published October 2012

    Artforms Creative Writing, Multi-Arts

    Organisation Writers in Prison Network

    • Talent 4....

    Evaluation of an arts-based workshop programme aiming to increase participants awareness of their own innate talents and skills, this research project sought to measure the effects of participating in a Talent 4... project on offenders' self -belief in their capacity to gain employment, strengths and weaknesses, ability to work with ... read on →

    Author Laura Caulfield (Birmingham City University)

    Published 2012

    Artform Multi-Arts

    Organisation Rideout   Project venues Brinsford, Drake Hall, Sudbury

    Participant type Male and Female Adult Offenders

    Sample size: 18

    Go to homepage

    Arts Alliance Evidence Library

    Filters: Prison [x], Multi‑Arts [x], Observation [x]

    Filter by:

    [x] close filter
    CJS Context [ + ]
    Prison [x]
    Participant type [ + ]
    Offenders (1)
    Project venue [ + ]
    Brinsford (1)
    Drake Hall (1)
    Sudbury (1)
    Region [ + ]
    England (2)
    Art form [ + ]
    Multi‑Arts [x]
    Creative Writing (1)
    Project Outputs [ + ]
    Accredited Course (1)
    Arts‑based workshops (1)
    Structured workshop programme (1)
    Model of Change [ + ]
    Learning Styles (1)
    Evaluation focus [ + ]
    Impact of arts‑based approaches (1)
    Impact of programme (1)
    Improved model of delivery (1)
    Learning (1)
    Key indicator [ + ]
    Best practice review (1)
    Confidence (1)
    Employability (1)
    Impact on Institution (1)
    Programme design (1)
    Relationships with staff (1)
    Methodology [ + ]
    Observation [x]
    Aspirations Index (1)
    Assessments of change (1)
    Diaries (1)
    Discussion (1)
    Focus Groups (1)
    General Causality Orientations Scale (GCOS) (1)
    Interviews (2)
    Literature search (1)
    Outcomes analysis (1)
    Questionnaires (1)
    Data type [ + ]
    Qualitative (1)
    Qualitative and Quantitative  (1)
    Research Limitations [ + ]
    Sample size (1)
    Publication type [ + ]
    Academic Institution report (2)
    Participant age [ + ]
    Adult (1)
    Participant gender [ + ]
    Male and Female (1)
    Delivery methodologies [ + ]